Search found 3 matches
- 2015 Dec 28, 08:23
- Forum: xplorer² Professional
- Topic: blog: SHA1 christmas spoiler
- Replies: 17
- Views: 5975
Re: blog: SHA1 christmas spoiler
Correct -- I'm the person that answered the Stack Overflow question and was pointing out the same thing to you.
- 2015 Dec 24, 14:31
- Forum: xplorer² Professional
- Topic: blog: SHA1 christmas spoiler
- Replies: 17
- Views: 5975
Re: blog: SHA1 christmas spoiler
I realize that, but that timestamp server's certificate is SHA1. /td specifies the digest algorithm used by the server but doesn't determine the certificate of the server itself (read the linked article again -- the same question applies to http://timestamp.comodoca.com/rfc3161).
- 2015 Dec 23, 13:52
- Forum: xplorer² Professional
- Topic: blog: SHA1 christmas spoiler
- Replies: 17
- Views: 5975
Re: blog: SHA1 christmas spoiler
The timestamp cert for your SHA256 cert will still be SHA1 when using that time stamp server. We won't know until Jan. 1 if that's a problem, but see here for a solution:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/306 ... de-signing
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/306 ... de-signing