Search found 597 matches
- 2010 Mar 18, 16:18
- Forum: xplorer² Professional
- Topic: editor2 portable?
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2501
im not sure how the registry data works. so i want to know this: when i run editor2 portably, will changing the folder from which editor2 runs from make editor2 add additional registry data each time editor runs from a different folder? or will it always add to... HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Zabara...
- 2010 Mar 18, 14:29
- Forum: xplorer² Professional
- Topic: editor2 portable?
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2501
- 2010 Mar 18, 00:25
- Forum: xplorer² Professional
- Topic: Anyone have 1.8.0.9 installed? What version is editor2?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 730
- 2010 Mar 17, 21:36
- Forum: xplorer² Professional
- Topic: Anyone have 1.8.0.9 installed? What version is editor2?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 730
Anyone have 1.8.0.9 installed? What version is editor2?
I haven't bothered upgrading to 1.8.0.9 yet. But does anyone have 1.8.0.9 installed? If so, what version is editor2? I'm curious to see if editor2 on my USB stick is still the latest version. Thanks.
- 2010 Mar 17, 15:08
- Forum: xplorer² Professional
- Topic: editor2 portable?
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2501
- 2010 Mar 17, 10:28
- Forum: xplorer² Professional
- Topic: editor2 portable?
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2501
- 2010 Mar 16, 22:25
- Forum: xplorer² Professional
- Topic: editor2 portable?
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2501
editor2 portable?
Is there a portable version of the text program editor2 that we can use by itself?
- 2009 Dec 27, 22:33
- Forum: xplorer² Professional
- Topic: Uninstall xplorer2 does not disassociate xplorer2 as default
- Replies: 3
- Views: 857
- 2009 Dec 27, 22:32
- Forum: xplorer² Professional
- Topic: Uninstall xplorer2 does not disassociate xplorer2 as default
- Replies: 3
- Views: 857
- 2009 Dec 25, 23:25
- Forum: xplorer² Professional
- Topic: Uninstall xplorer2 does not disassociate xplorer2 as default
- Replies: 3
- Views: 857
Uninstall xplorer2 does not disassociate xplorer2 as default
After uninstalling xplorer2, it does not properly disassociate xplorer2 as the default file browser. So when browsing folders with Windows Explorer, there is a system error sound each time we access a folder. Can this be fixed?
BTW: I'm on Windows 7.
BTW: I'm on Windows 7.
- 2009 Dec 25, 20:07
- Forum: xplorer² Professional
- Topic: BUG: Deleting file doesnt show up in recycler folder...
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1212
- 2009 Dec 25, 20:00
- Forum: xplorer² Professional
- Topic: BUG: Bookmarks don't work when recycler is active folder...
- Replies: 1
- Views: 644
BUG: Bookmarks don't work when recycler is active folder...
BUG on Windows 7 Bookmarks [except for ones that point to the root of a drive such as C:\ or D:\] don't work when recycler is active folder. The current inconvenient workaround for this is to click on a bookmark that point to the root of a drive and then clicking on desired bookmark. Can this be f...
- 2009 Dec 25, 19:44
- Forum: xplorer² Professional
- Topic: Drag tabs to opposite pane?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 973
Drag tabs to opposite pane?
How about make it possible to drag tabs to opposite pane? Would be quicker than using the right click menu.
- 2009 Dec 10, 16:05
- Forum: xplorer² Professional
- Topic: Toolbar button for "mark > matching a rule" ?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 486
Toolbar button for "mark > matching a rule" ?
Is there a way to add a toolbar button for "mark > matching a rule" ? If not, can this toolbar button option be added in a future version?
- 2009 Nov 01, 10:24
- Forum: xplorer² Professional
- Topic: Bookmarks can't access drives' subfolders on Windows 7 x64..
- Replies: 3
- Views: 940
Bookmarks can't access drives' subfolders on Windows 7 x64..
1.7.2.6 on Windows 7 x64
When the active folder is the recycler, my bookmarks can't access my drives' subfolders--although I can access my drives' root. My bookmarks are correct. This problem didn't happen back in WinXP. Can this be fixed?
When the active folder is the recycler, my bookmarks can't access my drives' subfolders--although I can access my drives' root. My bookmarks are correct. This problem didn't happen back in WinXP. Can this be fixed?