zabkat support forum

your registration key information is always retained there's no way to remove the "trial" information for obvious reasons I realize most of it is still under construction, thus fluid, however I was thinking more from a business perspective for the end result.  If there's one thing that le...

Another observation - none of the uninstallers (x86 or x64) remove the registry entries dealing with "Personal Programme" registration - they only remove settings, etc.  Each time I reinstall, it thinks I'm kosher, so doesn't ask for my code. I mention this as it makes judging the true eff...

i bet the uninstaller fails to "undo" the filesystem registration so x2 remains the default app and people are potentially screwed? No, I just reinstalled/uninstalled again and the same problems as above occur, but this time (obscurely) it did offer to remove the registry bits, and now fi...

...has anybody tried the checkbox that makes x2 default for filesystem folders? That part DOES seem to work.  Haven't used it in the wild enough to know if it catches everything, but initially it's grand.  (And useful, though I thought it went against your "non-integration" ethos.) @ckit,...

I first uninstalled the x86 version (via control panel) and agreed to remove all registry settings. The installer does choose the default directory as (x86), however, changing it to the standard x64 \Program Files works fine. All shortcuts reference the appropriate x2 - ed2 executables, and they inv...

But it has no simpler reference?  And, more importantly, is it hardware (generated) dependent, or a typically long-winded Windows label for a generic address?  I'm thinking of the portable pen-drive approach.

...no use installing an app just  to use it once. It's a pity bloated malware like Adobe-(anything) and the like have instilled an honest dislike of any superfluous installation procedures.  Fair enough, I try to run a clean ship too.  Unwarranted in this case.  It's harmless, unintrusive, and surp...

Whilst I was only too happy Vista did away with XP's rather condescendingly childish "My Computer" nomenclature, is there a simpler method than attaching "::{20D04FE0-3AEA-1069-A2D8-08002B30309D}" to a shortcut for X2? It's not as condescending, to be sure, but it doesn't just ro...

For a slightly less nuts and bolts approach, try this handy little freeware programme designed specifically for finding/removing empty folders.  A simple option can be set to not consider *.JPG's, thus considering the folder empty if no other file types exist.  Very handy for managing those pesky mu...

My original purpose for linking that article was not to proselytise to the unconverted, unconvinced x86 proletariat majority.  Simply to suggest a clarification to those who are so lost as to ask if " the new x64 version of x2 will be available for x32 [sic] Windows. "  Inevitable, I suppo...

As Nikos' recent blog resparked the questions pertaining to x64 (and it's purpose/functionality), hopefully this link will provide a port in the storm of teacups. A much as it pains me to create a "brief", "terse", "castrated" post (and no doubt relieves others :D), 64-...

Thongs go well with Brazilian beaches - come to think of it, so do "bumps" but as this is a family show, we'll leave that watershed alone.  :D As anyone familiar with programming will say, no product can ever be considered a "complete product"... by the laws of human exploration,...

...that feature was in the plan until xplorer2 got kitted with the miniscrap. Although having a single road through Thermopylae did prove fortuitous for the beleaguered Spartans, would it be such an evil were the civic authorities to put a little time and effort into road infrastructure and offer t...

...this is already in my list for the future Apparently in 2005 it was sardonically rumoured that the future was an epic place where pigs could fly for a month of Sundays through the high waters of Hell... But the Future had a lesson to be found in A short History of Greece: Who knew then that 2005...

...tersely speaking... unless you forcely press Ctrl+D twice... Ah ha, indeed true (it was the twice bit that had me flummoxed).  Why twice? Though again it's seems a case of rules formulated for antiquated hardware rather than practical use.  I understand the intent behind the limitation (and I et...