From the viewpoint of a 14-year-old who played on one once upon a time (via one of those mad super-wide DECWriter things), I couldn't agree more. Until I discovered the VAX, that is.drac wrote:The PDP-11 was one of the best of the computers of that era - at least from a programmer's viewpoint.
To the contrary, contextually the tales are told from the viewpoint of people running away from Florence to hide from the plague. The stories they tell are actually rather bawdy (as is much literature from the time, contrary to popular impression), and as counterpoint to Dante's Divine Comedy (now that one's a bit depressing), Boccaccio's work is considered the Human Comedy - and it is indeed a real comedy - a major influence on Chaucer, anon. (The stories actually number around a hundred told, collectively, by 10 Florentine youngsters... hence the name.)drac wrote:I would think that would make it a negative example of that time.
In case you're wondering why someone who claims to have been a philosophy major (in a previous life) would know so much about literature, it's just considered as part of the required curriculum... one cannot read the Brothers Karamazov by Dostoevsky and not feel one has been whacked on the head by a lifetime of theology... nor can one lightly fleece Proust's Remembrance of Things Past without dying a little one's self beneath the weight of time as conceived in his memory; as the most important man ever to have lived (in my meagre opinion), Montaigne loved to paraphrase Cicero by repeating "to philosophise is to learn how to die" to anyone who would listen. Needs be that one reads the ponderously pedantic "proper" philosophy as well, but those books speak of knowledge - not of life. Life is literature.
In case you weren't actually wondering about that, console yourself with the idea that philosophy is also about learning how to think... not merely the ebb and flow of what is considered logic throughout the centuries (again, contrary to popular opinion, logic is a malleable substance - it's much more than just a series of reasonable syllogisms which people use to console themselves that "eventually one would reach clarity and possibly truth" if followed to conclusion).
And, in case you weren't wondering that either, well - what can I say - I'm waffling. I do that. One gets used to it.