wperkins99 wrote:Since I know that ZIP is still the de facto standard for downloading compressed files from software companies and both Shareware and Freeware developers, I knew this comment wasn't accurate.
I think, as a matter of clarity, when he stated "All the archives out there are RAR" I believe he's referring to all the "more interesting stuff" found on RapidShare, et al, not your "boring and dull" (read with a James Dean sneer) legitimate stuff
. Indeed, the RAR format is more prevalent in those areas given its self-handling mass-splitting and password protection aspects. From that point of view, he's not strictly inaccurate, numbers-wise; no self-respecting pirate would bother with anything so pedestrian as ZIP.
While the UnRAR,dll is freely available, its inclusion in 3rd party programs immediately leads to de-facto "mixed licensing" agreements which perhaps some developers don't wish to involve themselves in, no matter how harmless they may be perceived to the end user, who, as Google well knows, will blindly agree to anything you put in an EULA without a second thought.
Personally, I've never understood why anyone would want archives integrated - all it does is add another layer of abstraction to the file system leading to further possibility of accidental mishandling by the myriad of dodgy shell extensions in use today - never mind the extra layer of processing necessary to make it seamless. If you've ever had a friend who bought a netbook "because it was cute", you'd never hear the end of "why is it so slow with these zip-things?"