Smart file sorting
Moderators: fgagnon, nikos, Site Mods
Smart file sorting
Is "smart sorting" part of xplorer2?
By smart sorting I mean, say I have three files, file1text.txt, file2text.txt and file10text.txt.
In explorer, when sorted by name, these would be displayed as
file1.txt
file2.txt
file10.txt
In xplorer2 however they are displayed as
file1.txt
file10.txt
file2.text
Explorer smartly sorts them, as obviously 2 is less than 10. If this isn't already in xplorer2 then it's a feature request. :)
By smart sorting I mean, say I have three files, file1text.txt, file2text.txt and file10text.txt.
In explorer, when sorted by name, these would be displayed as
file1.txt
file2.txt
file10.txt
In xplorer2 however they are displayed as
file1.txt
file10.txt
file2.text
Explorer smartly sorts them, as obviously 2 is less than 10. If this isn't already in xplorer2 then it's a feature request. :)
in the old days, when men were men and women wouldn't mind giving birth in emergency barns , computer users would understand the strict necessity of lexicographic sort and thanked the heavens because they saw the goodness in it. It is fast and if you want to have files sorted numerically you prepend zeros to the smallest of them like file01.txt
now microsoft offers this kludge for the not-so-hardcore users. It slows things down and its effect would be evident in large folders. Is this progress?
now microsoft offers this kludge for the not-so-hardcore users. It slows things down and its effect would be evident in large folders. Is this progress?
Totally agree with Nikos. Keep it sorted lexicographically!! The lazy !@#$%^&*'s who are not willing to add that extra '0' (or more than one if necessary) in front of the numbers have to suffer :twisted:
Tip: If you have to rename lots of files with numbers, the batch feature of X² comes to the rescue (menu Tools|Command script... or Ctrl+B after selecting the files to be renamed; see also the manual for more info about this)
Tip: If you have to rename lots of files with numbers, the batch feature of X² comes to the rescue (menu Tools|Command script... or Ctrl+B after selecting the files to be renamed; see also the manual for more info about this)
Dumb questions are the ones that are never asked
yes, XP does the new 'granny' number sort.
I didn't realize it until Whitman asked the question (my first reaction was disbelief -- then I checked)
Even though files I name use prepended zeros for lex-sort (& also easy-to-read common width), the files I often have to work with from other sources are not so nicely named.
So I concur with the others that it IS a useful, timesaving, error-reducing feature for granny & for me.
PS - & request for a related feature:
How about a special mass rename option to zeropad numbers in selected filenames? -- Even if only useful for files the user CAN rename.
{could also be a trial testbed for part of granny number sort development before stuffing that into the recently upgraded sort routine.}
I didn't realize it until Whitman asked the question (my first reaction was disbelief -- then I checked)
Even though files I name use prepended zeros for lex-sort (& also easy-to-read common width), the files I often have to work with from other sources are not so nicely named.
So I concur with the others that it IS a useful, timesaving, error-reducing feature for granny & for me.
PS - & request for a related feature:
How about a special mass rename option to zeropad numbers in selected filenames? -- Even if only useful for files the user CAN rename.
{could also be a trial testbed for part of granny number sort development before stuffing that into the recently upgraded sort routine.}
What did you expect asking if the usual suspects want more options?nikos wrote:there you go, we've reached critical mass already!
but gents, it will be registry only tweak for the time being
But I hope the "for the time being" is only temporary because for me (and I suspect for Fred too) the value in the option is to *switch* between the sorts comfortably to "clean" it up.