Xplorer2 featured at lifehacker.com

Discussion & Support for xplorer² professional

Moderators: fgagnon, nikos, Site Mods

User avatar
snakebyte
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 430
Joined: 2003 May 07, 07:14
Location: Seattle
Contact:

Xplorer2 featured at lifehacker.com

Post by snakebyte »

lifehacker.com is a poweruser's site that I visit every day. It features lots of productivity tips and cool tools. It was great to see mention of xplorer2 there today.

Check it out....

http://lifehacker.com/software/geek-to- ... 258730.php
Help! I'm an AI running around in someone's universe simulator.
User avatar
nikos
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 15806
Joined: 2002 Feb 07, 15:57
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by nikos »

that explains the extra traffic, although by the looks of it it is more of a slashdot mob, check out the type of comments about it:
http://digg.com/software/Replace_Window ... h_Xplorer2

still all publicity is good publicity :)
wasker
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 799
Joined: 2005 Oct 21, 16:33
Location: WA, USA
Contact:

Post by wasker »

Digg flock looks like a bunch of a cheap bastards. :)
I'm using Xplorer2 - the only file manager that does not suck. Actually, it rocks!
User avatar
fgagnon
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 3737
Joined: 2003 Sep 08, 19:56
Location: Springfield

Post by fgagnon »

and those that had "how to..." questions didn't bother to come here and ask
(nor RTFM).

What does that imply about those "power users" ?
User avatar
nikos
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 15806
Joined: 2002 Feb 07, 15:57
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by nikos »

what's even more amazing is that these are the kind of people that a marketer should target to increase sales.. forget about the rules of logic and dispassionate discourse :)
User avatar
fgagnon
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 3737
Joined: 2003 Sep 08, 19:56
Location: Springfield

Post by fgagnon »

Even though some didn't bother, there are enough who did take the time to learn and/or RTFM that there are many very positive words for x2 there amidst the postings from folks who seem to prefer to provide knee-jerk opinions without evaluation.
Let's not paint them all with same brush.
Even though I singled out those who didn't bother to ask (or read), there is a lot of diversity there -- much of it competent.
And the point is well-made in a couple of posts that selection of a file manager is more often than not based on personal preferences and peeves.
The nearly universal peeve being recognition of the sh!!ty functionality of the M$ products.
So, overall I rate it as positive press.  :thumbup:
User avatar
Thracx
Silver Member
Silver Member
Posts: 263
Joined: 2004 Nov 05, 19:33
Contact:

Post by Thracx »

*bump*

There's a new Lifehacker article out there praising X², check it out:
The Best Alternative File Browser for Windows

And if only they knew how to enable to 'Robust' copy/delete features of X², they would have had nothing negative to say ("it uses Windows Explorer's built-in file operations").
-Thracx

"Man wants to know, and when he ceases to do so, he is no longer a man."
-Fridtjof Nansen
User avatar
pschroeter
Silver Member
Silver Member
Posts: 283
Joined: 2007 Jan 27, 00:46

Re: Xplorer2 featured at lifehacker.com

Post by pschroeter »

snakebyte wrote:lifehacker.com is a poweruser's site that I visit every day. It features lots of productivity tips and cool tools. It was great to see mention of xplorer2 there today.

Check it out....

http://lifehacker.com/software/geek-to- ... 258730.php
Your link points to a 4 year old article on xplorer2. I think you meant to point to the current article:

The Best Alternative File Browser for Windows

http://lifehacker.com/5824811/the-best- ... or-windows
Kilmatead
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Posts: 4580
Joined: 2008 Sep 30, 06:52
Location: Dublin

Re: Xplorer2 featured at lifehacker.com

Post by Kilmatead »

pschroeter wrote:Your link points to a 4 year old article on xplorer2
You'll note that Snakebyte's original post (which you quoted) was - strangely enough - 4 years ago. It would have been quite interesting if he could have posted a link to something in 2011 back in 2007. :wink:

You can blame Thracx for bumping this thread.  Which, if nothing else, offers the curious reader the opportunity to compare LifeHacker's review style - which seems to have degraded badly into empty brevity.   People really rely upon this site?
User avatar
FrizzleFry
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Posts: 1241
Joined: 2005 Oct 16, 19:09

Post by FrizzleFry »

In this Twitter age a couple of paragraphs is a review... I guess.
User avatar
nikos
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 15806
Joined: 2002 Feb 07, 15:57
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by nikos »

there's more review if you read further down, things that look like advertisements are actually review text :)

what's missing is the usual lifehacker user comments, so this mustn't be some headline article in lifehacker
Tuxman
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Posts: 1610
Joined: 2009 Aug 19, 07:49

Post by Tuxman »

FrizzleFry wrote:In this Twitter age a couple of paragraphs is a review... I guess.
Let us review Lifehacker then!

While they seem to have pretty much of an idea how everything works (and they are one of the last websites which don't follow the latest hypes), they are still wrong often enough.
Tux. ; tuxproject.de
registered xplorer² pro user since Oct 2009, ultimated in Mar 2012
wperkins99
Bronze Member
Bronze Member
Posts: 106
Joined: 2004 Jul 11, 14:55

Post by wperkins99 »

Regarding Lifehacker, this "App Directory" is a relatively new feature that differs somewhat from what you might be used to seeing.

Before you get too critical of them, they did headline the article: "The Best Alternative File Browser for Windows"....

As far as relying on the site, I consider Lifehacker definitely worth reading, at least.
Ampa
Member
Member
Posts: 16
Joined: 2004 Jul 27, 00:21

Post by Ampa »

I did post a comment detailing the inaccuracies in the article, but it never got published... hmmm.

Oh well.
rusty
Member
Member
Posts: 18
Joined: 2006 Dec 28, 22:07
Location: Netherlands

Post by rusty »

Ampa wrote:I did post a comment detailing the inaccuracies in the article, but it never got published... hmmm.

Oh well.
Funny, I did the same 2 days ago, never saw it back...
Tells a lot about the quality
Post Reply