No. By even trying to do so you have already crossed the streams of the space-time continuum and now all cups of coffee in the southern-hemisphere will taste like tuna fish. This is a very bad thing. (But seriously, not even renaming the EXE's to try and fool the mutexen/mutices/mutexes would make a difference.)johngalt wrote: Got a different question - is there a way to reliably use both versions side by side simultaneously?
Agreed. Terrible. Awful. And certainly not full of Awe. (Same for its sister-dialog in find-files.) It makes sense where it is in the "plain" mode, but it's wrong to relocate it back and forth when ticked. Also the blue-colour of the link in dark-mode is unreadable. Indeed, evil, one might say.Gandolf wrote: Hyper-filter dialogs are badly laid out. The "simple version / more options" is in the middle of nowhere, very small and not clearly visible. It should not be jumbled in with the settings for the function...
Two quick observations:
Mark -> Use Checkboxes should not have a literal check-"icon" in the menu (it makes it look like it's already activated), it should act like Goto -> Mirror Scrolling where the menu item only receives a real check-mark when actually checked and is otherwise blank.
Using checkboxes to select more than 1 similar item (for example, three text files) and then right-clicking an item and selecting "Open" does not act upon all three checked files, only upon the highlighted ones. If you're going to segregate normal-selections from check-selections, be consistent about it. Or, better yet, don't embrace two paradigms at the same time. Only Picasso could do that convincingly.