Searching for duplicate photographs in different volumes, i-DeClone grouped various TIFF photographs together, with differences from 97% to various 100% similarity. I thought that was odd, because the names are different, and I know what the photos are about.
Fair enough, I opened them and they are absolutely different. I mean totally different. Different places, indoors/outdoors, people/no people etc.
Below is an example group results:
Code: Select all
Name Size Date modified Group # % Similar
que_003_.tif 18.8 MB 03/12/2020 18:15 2 97
que_009_.tif 17.7 MB 03/12/2020 18:17 2 100
que_008_.tif 17.6 MB 03/12/2020 18:17 2 100
que_007_.tif 17.6 MB 03/12/2020 18:16 2 100
que_006_.tif 18.3 MB 03/12/2020 18:16 2 98
que_005_.tif 17.6 MB 03/12/2020 18:16 2 98
que_004_.tif 17.6 MB 03/12/2020 18:15 2 100
I don't think i-DeClone uses a hash comparison to check for files that are 100% the same, but I checked just in case and, of course, they are completely different:
The only similarity is that all of these were scanned with the same scanner and at same settings, but I have hundreds of other photos scanned like this and that don't show up as duplicates when scanning their folders.
If I change the scan to find only 100% similarity and compare file contents, then indeed those files are not identified as duplicates.
Does that mean that, to be on the safe side, we should always compare the contents when seeking duplicates in photographs?
THanks