blog: file sharing

Discussion & Support for xplorer² professional

Moderators: fgagnon, nikos, Site Mods

Post Reply
User avatar
nikos
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 15794
Joined: 2002 Feb 07, 15:57
Location: UK
Contact:

blog: file sharing

Post by nikos »

here's the comment area for today's blog post found at
http://www.zabkat.com/blog/16Aug09-file-sharing.htm
Cosmo
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 465
Joined: 2007 Apr 17, 11:09

Post by Cosmo »

There is a little mistake:

You say in the blog
... C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\Documents folder where everyone on your computer has full access.
Correct is: Everyone can read and write inside this branch, but (without admin pivileges) the user cannot alter or delete files, that have been created (= owned) by another user (regardless of the account type of the user, who created the file). This can even be seen with the second picture in the blog: Users can read and execute, but not write and modify.

Another point is the fact, that the simple sharing mode option does not exist in XP Home Edition. In Windows' safe mode only you can reach the security tab. But XP HE users can download FileSecPatch, which enables the security tab in the properties of files and folders in the normal mode. It works like a charm without any problems.
User avatar
nikos
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 15794
Joined: 2002 Feb 07, 15:57
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by nikos »

that is not true, any user can delete and modify anybody else's stuff in "all users" shared folder. In fact in there the regular rules apply, so if you put a file and then change its security to effectively unshare it, then it will not be accessible by others

the "all users" folder just has some default attributes (that all files placed in it inherit them) which give a free for all access
User avatar
WimdeLange
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 416
Joined: 2004 Aug 16, 08:41
Location: NL

Post by WimdeLange »

Never, but never use file encryption. If you lose your password, your files are lost too. Forcing a change of your password? Then the files are not readable any more.

Better use things like TrueCrypt. Ok, if you loose your password of that, you are out of luck. But there are other reasons then loosing your password, for resetting a windows account which makes it impossible to read your files.

If I remember well I read this in these forums (and tested this behaviour too)
Groetjes,
  Wim de Lange
Cosmo
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 465
Joined: 2007 Apr 17, 11:09

Post by Cosmo »

nikos wrote:that is not true, any user can delete and modify anybody else's stuff in "all users" shared folder.
Your own 2nd pic shoes the opposite: Users cannot write and modify, as easily to be seen. - The user nikos can, as long as he is the creator; but if you create another limited account you will find, that he cannot. This can be changed, but the blog is supposed to speak about default settings.
nikos wrote:change its security to effectively unshare it, then it will not be accessible by others
That is quite obvious. But if all users shall have the right to alter or delete any file inside the folder (regardless of it's creator - where is this user group in the pic BTW?) you have to tick the "modify"-field (the "write"-field gets a tick mark in this case automatically).

You can find the default permissions in this MS article, read the table and description about Level 3:
Restricted Users can only read the files in the Shared Documents folder.
Cosmo
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 465
Joined: 2007 Apr 17, 11:09

Post by Cosmo »

Wim,

in general I agree with you (inclusive TrueCrypt). But there might be a misunderstanding point: If the account owner himself changes his password, NTFS-encrypted files are still accessible; the same is true, if a password reset disk (exact English wording may differ) is used in case of a lost password. But if an admin deletes / modifies the password for the user's account, you are correct. BTW: in this case the user loses more, e.g. the stored passwords for network access.
User avatar
nikos
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 15794
Joined: 2002 Feb 07, 15:57
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by nikos »

the snapshot in the article is from a normal file, not one of the shared folder. I guess it depends on your default settings, but on my XP/SP2 at least the common folder has free for all for everybody, try it! (I did)
Cosmo
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 465
Joined: 2007 Apr 17, 11:09

Post by Cosmo »

I never doubted, that you tried.

But I doubt about your default settings, therefor I linked the MS-site for you, and this says obviously something contrary to what you believe to be default.

BTW: XP-SP2 Brrr

But before you ask: SP3 did not change anything here. The MS-page is older than SP3.
User avatar
nikos
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 15794
Joined: 2002 Feb 07, 15:57
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by nikos »

it;s not about believing it's about seeing ;)
so you are telling me that on your SP3 things are by default as in the book?
Cosmo
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 465
Joined: 2007 Apr 17, 11:09

Post by Cosmo »

Hm, which book?

SP3 - as said - does nothing different to SP2, that is:
USER have in the Common Documents folder the rights to read and execute, and a special permission (only for this folder and subfolder - that means not for files) to create new files and folders. You have to go into the advanced security settings to see (and alter) that.

Furthermore you should see the user group CREATOR/OWNER with the special permission only for subfolder and files with full access. (In the result this means, every user can do with the himself created object whatever he wants.)

About seeing is better than believing: Here I am with you. As far as I remember you have asked some month ago about visualization software and I and another member gave some tips about Virtual Box. In case you should have installed such a software (otherwise I recommend to do so) it is the most easy way for "seeing" to install XP there. 30 days should be enough to check this. You can even make a snapshot of the fresh installation, play with the settings and can go back to the original state by simply going back to the snapshot point.

P.S. If you have not yet used Virtual Box, I suggest to search for version 2.2.4. The actual V3-branch does not look stable to me until now.
Post Reply