
blog: new editor2 with HTML tag matching
Moderators: fgagnon, nikos, Site Mods
-
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 4797
- Joined: 2008 Sep 30, 06:52
- Location: Baile Átha Cliath
-
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: 2009 Aug 19, 07:49
So DirectX is intended to compensate the performance decrease caused by the .net framework? That's ridiculous.Kilmatead wrote:Yeah, no, my mistake... I meant to say DirectX.
Designed to remove dependencies on the aging GDI subsystem, WPF is built on DirectX, which provides hardware acceleration
Tux. ; tuxproject.de
registered xplorer² pro user since Oct 2009, ultimated in Mar 2012
registered xplorer² pro user since Oct 2009, ultimated in Mar 2012
-
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 4797
- Joined: 2008 Sep 30, 06:52
- Location: Baile Átha Cliath
That's always been MS' philosophy, sort of a "if you build it, they will come" approach that says progressive-hardware will always compensate for the shortcomings of software.Tuxman wrote:So DirectX is intended to compensate the performance decrease caused by the .net framework? That's ridiculous.
They only backtrack on that if massive numbers of people reject their current implementation. Witness Vista (hardware) >> Win7 (hardware).

People often forget that while Gates is presented as the "Father of Windows", back in the 70's and '80's he was first and foremost a hardware enthusiast. He's never lost that ideal, and MS is imbued with it. One of the few software companies that is, much like Adobe.
Most others take the logical approach of optimization focus - though a lot of that even relies on the latest variations of (industry professional grade) Intel Compiler optimizations - but again, what are Intel? Hardware enthusiasts.
Gates would see optimization as "backwards looking" - unless he's at a shareholder's meeting, in which case he's all "rah rah".
-
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: 2009 Aug 19, 07:49