http://zabkat.com/blog/23-jan-11-softwa ... cy-map.htm
hells bells!
Moderators: fgagnon, nikos, Site Mods




Absolutely, but wait it gets worsewould you imagine that 13% of all xplorer² piracy comes from the wealthy USA?







Indeed, and this have been scientifically proven too. ( Take that nikos, only way to fight science is to do as religios people and plainly ignore the facts which is just childish, immature and but mostly plain pigheaded http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=c ... =pigheaded)Tuxman wrote:This would imply that everyone who "pirates" a software copy would also be willing to pay for it which is simply untrue.


A good example of what pirates are meant to be in order to sell more copies of romantic semi-comedian movies with Johnny Depp in them.BugHunter wrote:( see "Pirates of the Caribbean" for good example of pirates )


Depends on the context. While "KB/s" and "Kbit/s" make perfect sense, "KB" or "MB" most likely don't while talking about IT.snemarch wrote:I bet tuxman is the kind of guy who insists on using KiB, MiB etc. instead of kb and mb.
Not really.snemarch wrote:Yes, there's some validity to the arguments, but it's just too much arguing for the sake of arguing.
Claiming that a statistically proven point is childishly silly is childishly silly.snemarch wrote:claiming that unlicensed copying (PIRATING!1!! one one) doesn't cause a loss of income is just plain childishly silly.