blog: the horrors of win8
Moderators: fgagnon, nikos, Site Mods
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 16295
- Joined: 2002 Feb 07, 15:57
- Location: UK
blog: the horrors of win8
here's the comment area for today's blog post found at
http://zabkat.com/blog/windows8-virtualbox.htm
http://zabkat.com/blog/windows8-virtualbox.htm
-
- Gold Member
- Posts: 428
- Joined: 2011 Jan 23, 18:58
- Location: Sydney AU
-
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 4797
- Joined: 2008 Sep 30, 06:52
- Location: Baile Átha Cliath
-
- Member
- Posts: 30
- Joined: 2010 Feb 22, 12:56
-
- Gold Member
- Posts: 517
- Joined: 2007 Nov 18, 03:00
- Location: Tropical Hammock
-
- Member
- Posts: 33
- Joined: 2007 Feb 09, 13:32
Re: blog: the horrors of win8
About your failure to run Win 8 virtualized. I wonder whether you might do this using Prayaya ( http://fileforum.betanews.com/detail/Pr ... 33734408/1 ). Dunno whether it's necessary to have Win 8 pre-installed somewhere though... so can't tell of its capabilities relative to your needs. I should also say I haven't given Prayaya a real try myself. Well, just take it in the way of a suggestion as a possible alternative solution for virtualization.nikos wrote:here's the comment area for today's blog post found at
http://zabkat.com/blog/windows8-virtualbox.htm
Regards.
-
- Member
- Posts: 30
- Joined: 2010 Feb 22, 12:56
As regards other alternatives, VMware Workstation 8.0.2 (decidedly non-free) works very well (better than VirtualBox on my PC) which should mean that the free VMware Player 4.0.2 works equally well.
If you want to run Windows 8 on physical hardware with minimal disruption to your HD setup, this guide by Scott Hanselman explains how to boot off a Virtual Hard Disk.
If you want to run Windows 8 on physical hardware with minimal disruption to your HD setup, this guide by Scott Hanselman explains how to boot off a Virtual Hard Disk.
Last edited by bq3419 on 2012 Apr 09, 05:54, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Silver Member
- Posts: 283
- Joined: 2007 Jan 27, 00:46
I'll wait for Windows 9
I still run Windows XP, so I have been watching the development of Windows since from the sidelines. I have tried, and read about them and thought: Vista was a control freak, wanted and liked Windows 7, and I am horrified by Windows 8 and Metro.
So when I finally do update I think I'll wait for Windows 9.
So when I finally do update I think I'll wait for Windows 9.
-
- Member
- Posts: 39
- Joined: 2008 Dec 21, 04:29
Eight is a mixed bag
After two weeks of cautiously building up a fully functional Windows 8 x64 CP system in a dual boot arrangement with 7 on an SSD I find myself adjusting to it better than I first expected.
Metro for desktop users is either irrelevant or an irreducibly schizophrenic experience. After testing it for several days I made it mostly go away by arranging to boot through Start to the traditional desktop via the old 'Show Desktop' shortcut in the Start Folder of ProgramData. On a fast system the trip through Metro's Start screen is such a quick good-bye one may say 'we hardly knew ye'!
I gather Microsoft is committed to Metro because they have concluded the growth of Windows and its primary commercial development no longer lies with desktop computers. Personally, I think it would have made much more sense to have Eight's installer acknowledge a desktop computer with the clear choice to forgo the Metro Start screen; maybe this wisdom will find its way back from the Developer Preview into the shipping release in the fall.
As for the missing Start 'Orb' — no power user would sensibly rely on the Start Button or Orb since Windows 98. As we rely on xplorer2 and its competition (does it have any?) for file management, True Launch Bar annihilates Start's weak pretense of organizational competence and will permit it to be gratefully laid to rest this fall.
Woody Leonard himself — one of the sharpest Windows hackers and authors since the 90s — discovered a free Vista-era Sidebar gadget that perfectly expedites shutdown operations from the Desktop and the grand old shortcuts for all those things that have been around since the beginning of the XP-era are a cinch to add to Metro's Start screen — should one ever need to shut down or restart, etc. from there.
Office 2007 and 2010 have finally inured me to the appalling Ribbon, so its latest conquest of Windows 8 Explorer is a negligible event. I run Explorer with the Ribbon happily minimized and hear there is a good replacement for it called xplorer2 Pro.
My experience confirms what has been widely reported that Eight is more economical with system resources and so RAM and seems quicker to load my Office applications than Seven. For somewhat older systems this may be a consideration; but the current motherboards with BIOS-es optimized for SSDs + the latest multi-core CPUs are so fast I can't see this as a compelling reason for an upgrade.
And that I think is the ultimate conclusion here: For existing 7 desktop users Eight is a curiosity best heard about at a safe distance. For new desktop or, say, ultra-book (lovely machines!) purchasers, Eight is not to be feared (or loathed) — just mastered.
Metro for desktop users is either irrelevant or an irreducibly schizophrenic experience. After testing it for several days I made it mostly go away by arranging to boot through Start to the traditional desktop via the old 'Show Desktop' shortcut in the Start Folder of ProgramData. On a fast system the trip through Metro's Start screen is such a quick good-bye one may say 'we hardly knew ye'!
I gather Microsoft is committed to Metro because they have concluded the growth of Windows and its primary commercial development no longer lies with desktop computers. Personally, I think it would have made much more sense to have Eight's installer acknowledge a desktop computer with the clear choice to forgo the Metro Start screen; maybe this wisdom will find its way back from the Developer Preview into the shipping release in the fall.
As for the missing Start 'Orb' — no power user would sensibly rely on the Start Button or Orb since Windows 98. As we rely on xplorer2 and its competition (does it have any?) for file management, True Launch Bar annihilates Start's weak pretense of organizational competence and will permit it to be gratefully laid to rest this fall.
Woody Leonard himself — one of the sharpest Windows hackers and authors since the 90s — discovered a free Vista-era Sidebar gadget that perfectly expedites shutdown operations from the Desktop and the grand old shortcuts for all those things that have been around since the beginning of the XP-era are a cinch to add to Metro's Start screen — should one ever need to shut down or restart, etc. from there.
Office 2007 and 2010 have finally inured me to the appalling Ribbon, so its latest conquest of Windows 8 Explorer is a negligible event. I run Explorer with the Ribbon happily minimized and hear there is a good replacement for it called xplorer2 Pro.
My experience confirms what has been widely reported that Eight is more economical with system resources and so RAM and seems quicker to load my Office applications than Seven. For somewhat older systems this may be a consideration; but the current motherboards with BIOS-es optimized for SSDs + the latest multi-core CPUs are so fast I can't see this as a compelling reason for an upgrade.
And that I think is the ultimate conclusion here: For existing 7 desktop users Eight is a curiosity best heard about at a safe distance. For new desktop or, say, ultra-book (lovely machines!) purchasers, Eight is not to be feared (or loathed) — just mastered.
Last edited by atitlan on 2012 Apr 09, 20:49, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Gold Member
- Posts: 620
- Joined: 2010 Feb 04, 02:15
- Location: MeanWhile City
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 16295
- Joined: 2002 Feb 07, 15:57
- Location: UK
-
- Gold Member
- Posts: 509
- Joined: 2006 Jan 26, 14:01
- Location: Florida
-
- Member
- Posts: 36
- Joined: 2007 Sep 15, 19:58
-
- Gold Member
- Posts: 517
- Joined: 2007 Nov 18, 03:00
- Location: Tropical Hammock
Can I change OS at will to a non MS product, Hell yes......And I won't hesitate to do so. That also goes for any other piece of crappy software where the OEM's think they have a captive audience.TracyB wrote: Are your arguments valid? Yes.
Will they matter to anyone outside this forum. NURRP!
Do we matter to them? Not really.
Can we still be happy? YEPP!
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 16295
- Joined: 2002 Feb 07, 15:57
- Location: UK
interesting under the hood article
http://arstechnica.com/information-tech ... windows-8/
http://arstechnica.com/information-tech ... windows-8/