question

Angry_I · Post by **Angry_I** » 2005 Jan 10, 10:24

I have read in the full manual that x2 doesn't really need an installer and I didn't like it. I want your opinion.
Thanks

ckit · Post by **ckit** » 2005 Jan 10, 10:30

This thread is pointless, delete it or close it.

fgagnon · Post by **fgagnon** » 2005 Jan 10, 19:50

This is a valid question, with legitimate arguments for either case, even if only a minority cares about it.

& 'twould be more valid if there were an "It doesn't matter to me." option to choose from. ;)

WimdeLange · Post by **WimdeLange** » 2005 Jan 11, 09:14

I don't care (this option is not available), but I it is easy. Maybe do it both ways?

But this is not important.

Post by **nikos** » 2005 Jan 11, 13:02

installer is good especially for the lite version so people will know what kind of contract they are getting themselves into

uwee · Post by **uwee** » 2005 Jan 11, 16:04

zip is good especially for work - no new install with admin privileges necessary, only unzip in existing folder (as normal user)....

Post by **nikos** » 2005 Jan 11, 16:49

this problem can be circumvented
once you have installed in your work PC then you can unpack (install) somewhere you have admin privileges (e.g. your home computer) and just copy the files to your work

zabkat support forum

question

How do you want x2 to be distributed?

question